Stan A. Einstein wrote:

Triangle wrote:Stan certainly not the agressive ultimatum giving one. I hope neither. They are colleagues and should not shit where they eat as the expression goes. It is not high school.

Spencer.

What on earth are you on about?

daftasfxxx wrote: I would hope any girl with an ounce of sense would tell the second one to fuc right off

Mr Figo wrote:Gentleman One gets my vote

Gentleman two = transactional millenial

Stan A. Einstein wrote:

Mr Figo wrote:Gentleman One gets my vote

Gentleman two = transactional millenial

You're obviously a man.

Mr Figo wrote:

Stan A. Einstein wrote:

Mr Figo wrote:Gentleman One gets my vote

Gentleman two = transactional millenial

You're obviously a man.

Which one are you Stan? Definately number 2.

Exile 1976 wrote:He's got a pretty successful clothing business so I don't think he's going to struggle to pay the bills ...

The Newport wrote:

Exile 1976 wrote:He's got a pretty successful clothing business so I don't think he's going to struggle to pay the bills ...

Any chance of having the name of his Clothing Business please?

Stan A. Einstein wrote:

Bush wrote:
How is it weakness? Still don’t get this. The guy currently doesn’t have a knee good enough to play under 6’s football. We offered him a contract and basically he has till the time he gets fit to sign it. What is the rush? We were trying to sign someone who wouldn’t be ready till jan at the earliest. The club thought they had a chance of signing someone who if fit wouldn’t sign with us. I don’t see any issue with how this has been handled from the club or even joss’s point of view.

By way of analogy.

Imagine there are two equally attractive men who find one of their female colleagues very attractive. Both men are single, as is the woman, both good looking, both thoroughly decent chaps.

The first chap asks the woman on a date. Dinner on Saturday night. She says she'll think about it. Our man rings her the next day but she's still thinking it over. So he rings her again the next day. She still ponders.

At this juncture chap number two calls and asks her out on a date also. Coincidentally dinner on Saturday night. Our fair and lovely young woman says she'll think about it. However man number two says, no sorry, I really like you but you're not the only fish in the sea. If I haven't heard by five o'clock I'll take it as a no and move on.

Now who do you think gets the dinner date?

Exile 1976 wrote:

The Newport wrote:

Exile 1976 wrote:He's got a pretty successful clothing business so I don't think he's going to struggle to pay the bills ...

Any chance of having the name of his Clothing Business please?

L'avenir London isn't it? Something like that. Been around about 2yrs but got a big push this year. Apparently doing well.

Bush wrote:

lowandhard wrote:If that’s the case it underlines the opinion I have of some footballers these days. Despite the hicks up the road being apparently unwilling to commit until his fitness is proved if the January transfer info is true, he’s willing to chance it to get a bigger payday. This despite the fact that we gave him his chance and further committed to support him during his recuperation and have been good with him throughout.
At least Flynn can now finalise his plans without him, perhaps we’ll be better off without him long term, he was either injured or suspended for a considerable number of games when with us anyway. Thanks for your efforts Labadie but why you’d choose that option when you could play for a proper football club mystifies me.

I’d argue it would be typical of a modern day player to sign a long term deal with us even though he wants to leave just so he gets paid. Fair play to him if he is will to walk away and get fit before joining a club. Don’t see enough kids of this. We have even had players say they are so homesick they want to leave us but not want to rip up their contracts and still want us to pay them to leave. I wish him well if he leaves.

In regards to Neil’s question about him being one of the high earners surely the new season budget was based on his new contract offer which would be nowhere near what he was on.

Exile 1976 wrote:In fairness to Labadie he has obviously said no. Flynny said they can't reach a deal, it's all down to Flynny to withdraw offer, it's not Labadie's fault we're still begging him to sign.