As whoareya has already eloquently pointed out, and perhaps picking up on what Kevinmoorefellover has just written...
No, it doesn't take 6 weeks to count votes. What it does do is it takes time to analyse the results, to plan the various ways forward given the results, and to discuss them at board level (so the directors are prepared) before they can be presented at a meeting where lots of questions will/should be asked. How many full board meetings between now and then? One, two perhaps? Hence the likely reason for the meeting date (bearing in mind we also have league and cup fixtures to fulfil midweek between now and then).
As to the WRU situation, ever heard the saying "no news is good news"? So here's hoping! But seriously, we are consistently told we will be told things when there are actually things to tell. It is obvious, for whatever reason, we cannot yet be told anything (commercial confidentiality, not wishing to upset the landlord, discussions still ongoing, whatever, ...). Yes, perhaps we should be told officially that we are in discussions with our landlords and we will be told something when we are able to report anything. (But then I think we have effectively been told that already.) A monthly communique would be nice, though, even if it just says "Nothing to report this month".
As one Teddy Roosevelt Jr said:
It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena; whose face is marred by the dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions and spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who, at worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly; so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory or defeat.
And I always like the sentiment espoused by this one from a Wayne W Dwyer (whomsoever he may be... a US self-help advocate it seems):
A non-doer is very often a critic – that is, someone who sits back and watches doers, and then waxes philosophically about how the doers are doing. It's easy to be a critic, but being a doer requires effort, risk, and change.
Does this mean you can't have an opinion? No. There are ways to express them, but at times such ways seem lacking on this MB.