Toxic rumours? Penman & Stan

Newport County natter & football chatter.
User avatar
User

lowandhard

Posts

7783

Location

Peoples Republic of Malpas

Toxic rumours? Penman & Stan

Postby lowandhard » July 31st, 2018, 6:09 pm

no avatar
User

Lysaght Dancer

Posts

27

Re: Toxic rumours? Penman & Stan

Postby Lysaght Dancer » July 31st, 2018, 6:59 pm

Warning to anyone thinking of watching: if you want to save yourself from 4 minutes of a condescending Irishman telling you what an NDA is, just google it.

It’s also very interesting that someone who claims to have been a court room lawyer, has just made the huge mistake of saying ‘how do you think Harvey Weinstein’ got away with it for so long.

Last time I checked Harvey Weinstein hasn’t been convicted of anything.

Therefore the self proclaimed legal expert has just put himself in contempt of court. What an absolute plonker!
User avatar
User

Amber Nation

Posts

325

Re: Toxic rumours? Penman & Stan

Postby Amber Nation » July 31st, 2018, 7:31 pm

Oh don’t put people off, it is genuine comedy gold watching these clips. I’m no fan of Stan the Man, however, the point raised by him on Weinstein was based on the powers that an NDA has and how they suppresses people from coming forward with claims, regardless of implied guilt or otherwise. Given that it’s public knowledge that these NDA’s exist he is right that that claims against him were suppressed over a long period of time due to the clauses contained within these agreements.
User avatar
User

lowandhard

Posts

7783

Location

Peoples Republic of Malpas

Re: Toxic rumours? Penman & Stan

Postby lowandhard » July 31st, 2018, 8:07 pm

Amber Nation wrote:Oh don’t put people off, it is genuine comedy gold watching these clips. I’m no fan of Stan the Man, however, the point raised by him on Weinstein was based on the powers that an NDA has and how they suppresses people from coming forward with claims, regardless of implied guilt or otherwise. Given that it’s public knowledge that these NDA’s exist he is right that that claims against him were suppressed over a long period of time due to the clauses contained within these agreements.


Exactly, we all suspected that when we saw celebs taking out injunctions and super injunctions that there was a lot to hide , the trouble was with the latter that we never could find out who was hiding what without the democratic intelligence of the internet and that was sometimes difficult to find even for people with some insight.
I have no legal training barring a working knowledge of forensic pharmacy but it seems to me that if I was intent on dubious activities that I would be reaching for an NDA and a pen for someone to sign it. That excludes of course the scenario of Stan’s Special Brew cited in his vlog.
no avatar
User

Lenwearesaved

Posts

16

Re: Toxic rumours? Penman & Stan

Postby Lenwearesaved » July 31st, 2018, 9:29 pm

Lysaght Dancer wrote:Warning to anyone thinking of watching: if you want to save yourself from 4 minutes of a condescending Irishman telling you what an NDA is, just google it.

It’s also very interesting that someone who claims to have been a court room lawyer, has just made the huge mistake of saying ‘how do you think Harvey Weinstein’ got away with it for so long.

Last time I checked Harvey Weinstein hasn’t been convicted of anything.

Therefore the self proclaimed legal expert has just put himself in contempt of court. What an absolute plonker!


I really like watching Stans videos. He thinks that its worrying that people seem to insult him rather than talk about football. I just think your sad.
User avatar
User

lowandhard

Posts

7783

Location

Peoples Republic of Malpas

Re: Toxic rumours? Penman & Stan

Postby lowandhard » August 1st, 2018, 8:18 am

Lysaght Dancer, “ cat on a hot tin, sorry steel, roof “ ? I’d probably not use Weinstein to defend my point of view.
no avatar
User

Lysaght Dancer

Posts

27

Re: Toxic rumours? Penman & Stan

Postby Lysaght Dancer » August 1st, 2018, 11:44 am

lowandhard wrote:Lysaght Dancer, “ cat on a hot tin, sorry steel, roof “ ? I’d probably not use Weinstein to defend my point of view.


I wasn’t actually defending any position. Just pointing out the self proclaimed legal eagle made a huge error with that comment.

What’s your view on the rumours that the WRU trying to force us out? If true, I would dearly love us to take them to court so we can expose them for what we are.

Maybe the Irish lawyer could represent us? Actually, scrap that....
no avatar
User

Taunton Iron Cider

Posts

1885

Location

Taunton

Re: Toxic rumours? Penman & Stan

Postby Taunton Iron Cider » August 1st, 2018, 12:56 pm

Lysaght Dancer wrote:
lowandhard wrote:Lysaght Dancer, “ cat on a hot tin, sorry steel, roof “ ? I’d probably not use Weinstein to defend my point of view.


I wasn’t actually defending any position. Just pointing out the self proclaimed legal eagle made a huge error with that comment.

What’s your view on the rumours that the WRU trying to force us out? If true, I would dearly love us to take them to court so we can expose them for what we are.

Maybe the Irish lawyer could represent us? Actually, scrap that....


Actually I found Taff's blog comment that the Council may be looking for a land swop with the WRU very interesting. If true, it would represent very creative thinking as it allows the WRU to make its money without having to sell RP for development, and if they wish, move the Dragons franchise to North Wales.
no avatar
User

George Street-Bridge

Posts

5809

Re: Toxic rumours? Penman & Stan

Postby George Street-Bridge » August 1st, 2018, 1:05 pm

How would the WRU make money from a land swap while the only rugby team taking significant revenue left town?
User avatar
User

Mr Figo

Posts

684

Re: Toxic rumours? Penman & Stan

Postby Mr Figo » August 1st, 2018, 1:11 pm

I'm trying to work out what's on Stan's mug - a mermaid or a hula girl???
User avatar
User

ButchersDog

Posts

310

Re: Toxic rumours? Penman & Stan

Postby ButchersDog » August 1st, 2018, 1:29 pm

George Street-Bridge wrote:How would the WRU make money from a land swap while the only rugby team taking significant revenue left town?

Flogging on the land the council give them with planning consent I suppose.
no avatar
User

Taunton Iron Cider

Posts

1885

Location

Taunton

Re: Toxic rumours? Penman & Stan

Postby Taunton Iron Cider » August 1st, 2018, 2:02 pm

ButchersDog wrote:
George Street-Bridge wrote:How would the WRU make money from a land swap while the only rugby team taking significant revenue left town?

Flogging on the land the council give them with planning consent I suppose.


That is exactly how I would see it.
Let's face facts, the WRU are not really interested in RP as a stadium or indeed the loss making Dragon franchise.
They just saw an opportunity to make money on a very cheap land purchase, at the same time as recovering their money that was at risk with the Dragons.
User avatar
User

lowandhard

Posts

7783

Location

Peoples Republic of Malpas

Re: Toxic rumours? Penman & Stan

Postby lowandhard » August 1st, 2018, 4:49 pm

Lysaght Dancer wrote:
lowandhard wrote:Lysaght Dancer, “ cat on a hot tin, sorry steel, roof “ ? I’d probably not use Weinstein to defend my point of view.


I wasn’t actually defending any position. Just pointing out the self proclaimed legal eagle made a huge error with that comment.

What’s your view on the rumours that the WRU trying to force us out? If true, I would dearly love us to take them to court so we can expose them for what we are.

Maybe the Irish lawyer could represent us? Actually, scrap that....


Sorry, been out all day so only just read this. My opinion is this, I don’t believe the rumours that the WRU are trying to force us out Why on earth would they? We are paying them rent and whatever else is due under the terms of the lease which goes into their coffers. I believe that if we’re decent tenants that they’d want us to stay. For the record , neither do I believe that the Dragons will move to North Wales.
no avatar
User

whoareya

Posts

1862

Re: Toxic rumours? Penman & Stan

Postby whoareya » August 1st, 2018, 5:54 pm





Looks like Frank Carson, but not funny.
User avatar
User

Marky

Posts

2762

Location

Mazeglaas

Re: Toxic rumours? Penman & Stan

Postby Marky » August 1st, 2018, 6:00 pm

lowandhard wrote:
Lysaght Dancer wrote:
lowandhard wrote:Lysaght Dancer, “ cat on a hot tin, sorry steel, roof “ ? I’d probably not use Weinstein to defend my point of view.


I wasn’t actually defending any position. Just pointing out the self proclaimed legal eagle made a huge error with that comment.

What’s your view on the rumours that the WRU trying to force us out? If true, I would dearly love us to take them to court so we can expose them for what we are.

Maybe the Irish lawyer could represent us? Actually, scrap that....


Sorry, been out all day so only just read this. My opinion is this, I don’t believe the rumours that the WRU are trying to force us out Why on earth would they? We are paying them rent and whatever else is due under the terms of the lease which goes into their coffers. I believe that if we’re decent tenants that they’d want us to stay. For the record , neither do I believe that the Dragons will move to North Wales.


Of course they're trying to squeeze out every penny, we've got nowhere else to go, but I've never heard a reasonable explanation as to why they would want to turn down our money. What have we done that's upset them so much? The Dragons are never going to be profitable, as long as they stay I see no reason why they'd want rid of us.
Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

Powered by phpBB ®