First of all, the average number of Grimsby fans traveling to Rodney Parade the last two seasons is 221....
But let's talk about County fans listed as being in attendance. So far this season after just two games, our average number of home fans is 2870.
So the question is simple: Will the Grimsby attendance (for County fans) be higher or lower than 2870?.....
I will go for HIGHER. The overall gate should break 3,000 easily...... any thoughts?
Re: GRIMSBY ATTENDANCE...higher or lower?
3Do you get anything for a pair?UPTHEPORT wrote:Higher Bruce
Re: GRIMSBY ATTENDANCE...higher or lower?
5Will the Bank Holiday affect the attendance in a positive/negative manner?
Re: GRIMSBY ATTENDANCE...higher or lower?
6Willthiswork wrote:Will the Bank Holiday affect the attendance in a positive/negative manner?
The corresponding fixture last season, was Sat 26th August, Chesterfield (h), which was our first home game after a good few away games. We had just a shade over 4000 County fans.... but that was the FIRST home match.
I can't see the Bank Holiday making much of a difference, and we are on the back of a reasonable run, not that that's anything to go by.
Re: GRIMSBY ATTENDANCE...higher or lower?
7Obviously higher, for the simple fact that the current average is from two matches, only one of which was a Saturday fixture. Ask this question after say 20 matches and there may be 16 Saturdays and 4 Tuesdays. For a start, Grimsby will bring at least twice as many as Notts County did, and probably by that alone the attendance will be 250 more than Tuesday.
Re: GRIMSBY ATTENDANCE...higher or lower?
8I didn’t plan to go to the Grimsby game having become an exile but the game was that enjoyable on Tuesday I’ve dropped my original plans and will be travelling 140 miles to be there. The crowd will definitely be higher.
Re: GRIMSBY ATTENDANCE...higher or lower?
9Three wins and a draw at top of the table Exeter.If it's lower then we've got worries.
Re: GRIMSBY ATTENDANCE...higher or lower?
11Not in this game.Collars wrote:Do you get anything for a pair?UPTHEPORT wrote:Higher Bruce
It's bound to be higher, I'll go for 3,308.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users