Win bonuses go up if in top 2
1The world knows this just mentioned on efl show but not shareholders trust members obviously board is communicating with tv hosts discuss
Presumably it will be self-funding if it results in higher attendances?Caerleon Exile wrote:Mike Flynn mentioned it in an interview after the game, I read it in the Argus or Beeb. Incentives for staying in the top 2, fantastic for everyone. What's the problem?
It makes me even more excited for the prospect of a memorable season!
EXACTLY !!!Valleyboy1980 wrote:Just enjoy it ffs and stop trying to create problems and arguments. We as trust members/share holders do not need and should not know every detail. If Andrex toilet roll is used instead of Aldi own should we be consulted ? Lol
This!OLDCROMWELLIAN wrote:How nice (for now) we are even talking about such a thing.
Lidl's is even better.girl saturday wrote:Aldi's own is better than AndrexValleyboy1980 wrote:Just enjoy it ffs and stop trying to create problems and arguments. We as trust members/share holders do not need and should not know every detail. If Andrex toilet roll is used instead of Aldi own should we be consulted ? Lol
A lot of teams have schemes similar to this.wattsville_boy wrote:Apologies the Rick Wright idea was mentioned because I was going to advocate the idea of a sliding scale concept for win bonuses depending on where that result puts you in the division - and then forgot to do so. However, like the economics of sliding scale admission prices, the economics is possibly again wrong. If you're at the bottom scrapping to stay up then any payments for positive results have to higher than if you're playing a "dead rubber" in mid table.
Users browsing this forum: Lord Tredegar's Parrot