Re: Grandstand: Carlisle (Away)

66
excessbee wrote:Well, we played some wonderful football, but paid the price for conceding two sloppy early goals. Carlisle just weren't in the game for the second half...... until another mistake presented them with a late chance. We were far and away the better side.
Two good shouts for a penalty in the second half.
How did Robbie play?

Re: Grandstand: Carlisle (Away)

68
Blackandamber wrote:
excessbee wrote:Well, we played some wonderful football, but paid the price for conceding two sloppy early goals. Carlisle just weren't in the game for the second half...... until another mistake presented them with a late chance. We were far and away the better side.
Two good shouts for a penalty in the second half.
How did Robbie play?
Well, yet again he had to play out of position for much of the game, on the left of midfield. Looked far more comfortable later on when he switched to the right. I'm guessing that Pring may have started if fit, after his lively 15 minutes against Morecambe. We did play some splendid passing football.

Re: Grandstand: Carlisle (Away)

70
mike wilks wrote:Absolutely gutted, moreover for the effort, considering the injury situation, and the Loyal away following! ......
If we can avoid a "banana skin" result next weekend, under similar conditions and regain our league momentum, with an influx of returnees, we will prevail!........
I agree , we have 29 games to go , 7 points off the top and have not fielded our best 11 yet.

Re: Grandstand: Carlisle (Away)

72
rodneyboy wrote:Why didn't Foulston get at least 20 minutes at the end.How is he supposed to learn anything sat on the bench.Missing 3 centre halves and still don't get any game time,Really baffling.
Because we were playing superb football and there was no need to break the rhythm of our play. Just out of interest, who would you have replaced with Foulston?

Re: Grandstand: Carlisle (Away)

74
excessbee wrote:
rodneyboy wrote:Why didn't Foulston get at least 20 minutes at the end.How is he supposed to learn anything sat on the bench.Missing 3 centre halves and still don't get any game time,Really baffling.
Because we were playing superb football and there was no need to break the rhythm of our play. Just out of interest, who would you have replaced with Foulston?
Really felt we were lacking height at the back.You cannot play with only one recognised centre back as was proved.Carlisle hadn't scored for 8 hours before yesterday.

Re: Grandstand: Carlisle (Away)

75
rodneyboy wrote:
excessbee wrote:
rodneyboy wrote:Why didn't Foulston get at least 20 minutes at the end.How is he supposed to learn anything sat on the bench.Missing 3 centre halves and still don't get any game time,Really baffling.
Because we were playing superb football and there was no need to break the rhythm of our play. Just out of interest, who would you have replaced with Foulston?
Really felt we were lacking height at the back.You cannot play with only one recognised centre back as was proved.Carlisle hadn't scored for 8 hours before yesterday.
Hmm..... Yet none of Carlisle's goals came from any deficiency that could be put down to lack of height at the back.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amberexile, OLDCROMWELLIAN, Trigger