Well there is the perfect example of opposing perspectives when watching. Newport fans when watching their team trying to gain the momentum will have seen Mansfield disrupting those efforts through perceived diving. Mansfield fans watching their team trying to gain the momentum will have seen Newport as disrupting that through fouling. What I'm getting at is that it isn't so black and white. On reflection I don't think you're necessarily as dirty a team as I did when I was screaming obscenities at your players during the match and I would like to think that you'll see that we aren't a 'dark arts' team that looks to con the ref. I've watched us home and away all season and it simply isn't the case.Corpaboy wrote:Then again .... you were pretty much on your own watching the game from the away seats !Staggo wrote:Funny how perceptions can be so different in football. Now, we all know Danny Rose likes to go down easy, but we honestly don't see ourselves as that kind of team. We moan about teams like Wycombe, who have come to Field Mill and employed 'the dark arts', but I remember talking to one of their fans about it and he couldn't see why teams said that about them.
From our perspective, we thought Newport were extremely dirty and looked to rough up our players and prevent the game from flowing, which would have suited our style of play. With your pitch (which looked better, but was still very bobbly) this tactic is responsible for a reputation that I expect you probably don't feel is justified either. Just saying, perceptions and bias are funny things.
Plenty of leg room there
To say we looked to "prevent the game from flowing" , when so many times the game was stopped cos one of yours went down like a strike breaking porn star , is pushing it a bit ?
And you didn't bring any inflatable sheep ??
Shame on you !!!
As for inflatable sheep, we only get them our for Chesterfield