Re: Ryan Haynes

32
SJG99 wrote:I'm amazed that "management" are "concerned" at the "fitness" of a player they literally just signed, presumably after lengthy scouting and pre-signing fitness testing. Especially given that they've had all of a month, maybe, since he signed to go on.

Maybe County have been lucky that Nurse looked so good in pre-season, nothing cures like losing a starting place.
Surprise, surprise, dubious rumour that received the "quotation treatment" was cobblers. He's been very good, bit more two-footed than Butler and certainly suited to the role. Now feeling a bit for Nurse who was very good pre-season.

Re: Ryan Haynes

33
Surprise, surprise, dubious rumour that received the "quotation treatment" was cobblers. He's been very good, bit more two-footed than Butler and certainly suited to the role. Now feeling a bit for Nurse who was very good pre-season.[/quote]

....... and he was excellent at Gillingham too.

Re: Ryan Haynes

36
njbh86 wrote:Original post on this thread is aging formidably well
Seriously.
Flynny and Wayne will be over the moon.
Certainly we all are I hope.
The post from Willy Brown shows previous concerns which Ryan has shown are no longer a worry.
Brilliant start for us.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users