As predicted another failure to answer the question. I'll put it down to you having no answer as your comment was clearly nonsensical.
Btw, had I written as you suggest above it would not have accurately reflected what I was saying. It is a shame that your lack of knowledge of the laws of the game and of the game itself lead you to miscomprehend simple messages but no matter, I have better things to do with my time.
Re: Grandstand. County v Mansfield
92No Paul. You really are getting tedious now. I've answered your question thrice. I appreciate you don't like the answer.Amberexile wrote:As predicted another failure to answer the question. I'll put it down to you having no answer as your comment was clearly nonsensical.
Btw, had I written as you suggest above it would not have accurately reflected what I was saying. It is a shame that your lack of knowledge of the laws of the game and of the game itself lead you to miscomprehend simple messages but no matter, I have better things to do with my time.
Re: Grandstand. County v Mansfield
93I'll let you know whether I like the answer when you give one rather than fencing.Stan A. Einstein wrote:No Paul. You really are getting tedious now. I've answered your question thrice. I appreciate you don't like the answer.Amberexile wrote:As predicted another failure to answer the question. I'll put it down to you having no answer as your comment was clearly nonsensical.
Btw, had I written as you suggest above it would not have accurately reflected what I was saying. It is a shame that your lack of knowledge of the laws of the game and of the game itself lead you to miscomprehend simple messages but no matter, I have better things to do with my time.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users