Frank Nouble 3 wrote:Google it ExileExile 1976 wrote:Frank Nouble 3 wrote:Evening Pedant.Fourthousand wrote:Pedant again... 'Peace for our time'Frank Nouble 3 wrote:You forget the one contributor with at least 5 current names who I believe is no longer with us , or at least 4 of his imaginary friends.Fourthousand wrote:What are the chances of that, two voting systems, exactly the same result. Just goes to show that running two votes in tandem puts paid to any claims of vote rigging by disruptive parties... checks and balances and all that. Phew - we got there in the end and it probably now puts the issue to bed. Peace breaks out.Frank Nouble 3 wrote:Good afternoon poll now closed.
Thanks to all the genuine votes for Padraig clearly virtually every bodies MOM Saturday.
Amond 11 votes
King 1 vote
Will follow shortly with on going votes.
Thanks again
Frank
One of which voted for 2 separate players for the same game.
In fairness the system up and running only allows for 1 user 1 vote.
Marvellous
Appreciate you cannot stop the odd idiot voting just to mess things up.
Think everyone can live with that.
No need to mention names.
As Chamberlain said I believe
"peace in our time"
Look what happened next.
"Peace in our time"
I know you are just having a laugh.
Hopefully
If not its a concern
4K is right though , It was ‘Peace for our Time’ .. it’s often misquoted as you have as ‘Peace in our Time’.
The actual speech was called.
"peace in our time"
His actual words were.
"peace for our time"
All good fun
Sure either way it relates to the thread mate.
I don’t need to google it Frank, I took A level history. You said ‘as Chamberlain said’ and 4K just pointed out he didn’t say that ....but yes, just being pedantic I. fairness..