Fourthousand wrote:

Frank Nouble 3 wrote:With just around 100 superb supporters making it Saturday will give this away game a miss as voting will be minimal..
Normal service will be resumed Saturday.

Cheers Frank

Amond

Amond

Congratulations Jim by starting a second poll you have encouraged whoareya for 1 example to constantly wreck an enjoyable past time for a lot of contributors to this board.
At least he cannot vote anymore for Mark Almond or Harry the Dog anymore.
Padraig starts 1 up every week.
Then we have daftas "Sheehan was class today Amond missed a sitter I'm going for Amond as
he's my super duper favourite"
So that's a 2 start.
At least we wont be also adding 4 more votes for Padraig from ncrfc and his 3 imaginary friends.
ref23/ Colezey "fooking Amond"/ and sammymcpherson who are possibly no longer on this forum.
He must of been disappointed at his latest imaginary friend Wank Nouble 3 failed to get a comment in.
Jim you have got plenty between the ears so how the hell do you want to encourage this nonsense.
so like I say Padraig starts every game 2 in front of everybody else.
I finish this post with a comment from s.blair1979
"Amond did nothing today folk are trying to wind you up"
Thanks s.blair but they have and always will fail miserably.
Off for my morning run now.
Cheers

ps get yout votes in please.

One of the most comprehensive results ever for MOTM
Podge 11 votes King 1

Frank Nouble 3 wrote: I finish this post with a comment from s.blair1979
"Amond did nothing today folk are trying to wind you up"
Thanks s.blair but they have and always will fail miserably.

So now you've started your own Points Of View ?

Jeremy Vine won't be happy.

UPTHEPORT wrote:One of the most comprehensive results ever for MOTM
Podge 11 votes King 1

Jim

You just don't see it do you

Good afternoon poll now closed.
Thanks to all the genuine votes for Padraig clearly virtually every bodies MOM Saturday.

Amond 11 votes
King 1 vote

Will follow shortly with on going votes.

Thanks again

Frank

Frank Nouble 3 wrote:

UPTHEPORT wrote:One of the most comprehensive results ever for MOTM
Podge 11 votes King 1

Jim

You just don't see it do you

Somehow I have the feeling that he does, it's just not the same thing that you see. Ps Do they still do ye olde worlde leg pulling in Rogey/Rogy/Rogie'/Roggie - or is it now a lost art?

Padraig now moves into second place overall behind Josh
35 points 44 votes

King moves up to 10th spot with 6 votes and 11 points.

Takes a bit of time but will do the complete running total shortly.

Frank Nouble 3 wrote:Good afternoon poll now closed.
Thanks to all the genuine votes for Padraig clearly virtually every bodies MOM Saturday.

Amond 11 votes
King 1 vote

Will follow shortly with on going votes.

Thanks again

Frank

What are the chances of that, two voting systems, exactly the same result. Just goes to show that running two votes in tandem puts paid to any claims of vote rigging by disruptive parties... checks and balances and all that. Phew - we got there in the end and it probably now puts the issue to bed. Peace breaks out.

Fourthousand wrote:

Frank Nouble 3 wrote:Good afternoon poll now closed.
Thanks to all the genuine votes for Padraig clearly virtually every bodies MOM Saturday.

Amond 11 votes
King 1 vote

Will follow shortly with on going votes.

Thanks again

Frank

What are the chances of that, two voting systems, exactly the same result. Just goes to show that running two votes in tandem puts paid to any claims of vote rigging by disruptive parties... checks and balances and all that. Phew - we got there in the end and it probably now puts the issue to bed. Peace breaks out.

You forget the one contributor with at least 5 current names who I believe is no longer with us , or at least 4 of his imaginary friends.
One of which voted for 2 separate players for the same game.
In fairness the system up and running only allows for 1 user 1 vote.
Marvellous
Appreciate you cannot stop the odd idiot voting just to mess things up.
Think everyone can live with that.
No need to mention names.
As Chamberlain said I believe

"peace in our time"

Look what happened next.

Frank Nouble 3 wrote:

Fourthousand wrote:

Frank Nouble 3 wrote:Good afternoon poll now closed.
Thanks to all the genuine votes for Padraig clearly virtually every bodies MOM Saturday.

Amond 11 votes
King 1 vote

Will follow shortly with on going votes.

Thanks again

Frank

What are the chances of that, two voting systems, exactly the same result. Just goes to show that running two votes in tandem puts paid to any claims of vote rigging by disruptive parties... checks and balances and all that. Phew - we got there in the end and it probably now puts the issue to bed. Peace breaks out.

You forget the one contributor with at least 5 current names who I believe is no longer with us , or at least 4 of his imaginary friends.
One of which voted for 2 separate players for the same game.
In fairness the system up and running only allows for 1 user 1 vote.
Marvellous
Appreciate you cannot stop the odd idiot voting just to mess things up.
Think everyone can live with that.
No need to mention names.
As Chamberlain said I believe

"peace in our time"

Look what happened next.

Pedant again... 'Peace for our time'

Fourthousand wrote:

Frank Nouble 3 wrote:

Fourthousand wrote:

Frank Nouble 3 wrote:Good afternoon poll now closed.
Thanks to all the genuine votes for Padraig clearly virtually every bodies MOM Saturday.

Amond 11 votes
King 1 vote

Will follow shortly with on going votes.

Thanks again

Frank

What are the chances of that, two voting systems, exactly the same result. Just goes to show that running two votes in tandem puts paid to any claims of vote rigging by disruptive parties... checks and balances and all that. Phew - we got there in the end and it probably now puts the issue to bed. Peace breaks out.

You forget the one contributor with at least 5 current names who I believe is no longer with us , or at least 4 of his imaginary friends.
One of which voted for 2 separate players for the same game.
In fairness the system up and running only allows for 1 user 1 vote.
Marvellous
Appreciate you cannot stop the odd idiot voting just to mess things up.
Think everyone can live with that.
No need to mention names.
As Chamberlain said I believe

"peace in our time"

Look what happened next.

Pedant again... 'Peace for our time'

Evening Pedant.

Google

"Peace in our time"
I know you are just having a laugh.
Hopefully
If not its a concern

Here we go

Sheehan 57 points 150 votes
Amond 35 points 44 votes
Haynes 33 points 54 votes
Nurse 21 points 25 votes
Bennett 20 points 43 votes
O Brien 18 points 11 votes
Inniss 12 points 18 votes
Townsend 11 points 27 votes
Labadie 11 points 20 votes
King 11 points 6 votes
Abrahams 10 points 10 votes
Wilmott 9 points 32 votes
Demetriou 8 points 11 votes
Matt 7 points 7 votes
McNamarra 6 points 15 votes
Howkins 6 points 6 votes
Collins 6 points 5 votes
Maloney 5 points 9 votes
Whiteley 4 points 4 votes
Dolan 3 points 2 votes

Thanks every body

Frank

Frank Nouble 3 wrote:

Fourthousand wrote:

Frank Nouble 3 wrote:

Fourthousand wrote:

Frank Nouble 3 wrote:Good afternoon poll now closed.
Thanks to all the genuine votes for Padraig clearly virtually every bodies MOM Saturday.

Amond 11 votes
King 1 vote

Will follow shortly with on going votes.

Thanks again

Frank

What are the chances of that, two voting systems, exactly the same result. Just goes to show that running two votes in tandem puts paid to any claims of vote rigging by disruptive parties... checks and balances and all that. Phew - we got there in the end and it probably now puts the issue to bed. Peace breaks out.

You forget the one contributor with at least 5 current names who I believe is no longer with us , or at least 4 of his imaginary friends.
One of which voted for 2 separate players for the same game.
In fairness the system up and running only allows for 1 user 1 vote.
Marvellous
Appreciate you cannot stop the odd idiot voting just to mess things up.
Think everyone can live with that.
No need to mention names.
As Chamberlain said I believe

"peace in our time"

Look what happened next.

Pedant again... 'Peace for our time'

Evening Pedant.

Google

"Peace in our time"
I know you are just having a laugh.
Hopefully
If not its a concern

4K is right though , It was ‘Peace for our Time’ .. it’s often misquoted as you have as ‘Peace in our Time’.

Exile 1976 wrote:

Frank Nouble 3 wrote:

Fourthousand wrote:

Frank Nouble 3 wrote:

Fourthousand wrote:

Frank Nouble 3 wrote:Good afternoon poll now closed.
Thanks to all the genuine votes for Padraig clearly virtually every bodies MOM Saturday.

Amond 11 votes
King 1 vote

Will follow shortly with on going votes.

Thanks again

Frank

What are the chances of that, two voting systems, exactly the same result. Just goes to show that running two votes in tandem puts paid to any claims of vote rigging by disruptive parties... checks and balances and all that. Phew - we got there in the end and it probably now puts the issue to bed. Peace breaks out.

You forget the one contributor with at least 5 current names who I believe is no longer with us , or at least 4 of his imaginary friends.
One of which voted for 2 separate players for the same game.
In fairness the system up and running only allows for 1 user 1 vote.
Marvellous
Appreciate you cannot stop the odd idiot voting just to mess things up.
Think everyone can live with that.
No need to mention names.
As Chamberlain said I believe

"peace in our time"

Look what happened next.

Pedant again... 'Peace for our time'

Evening Pedant.

Google

"Peace in our time"
I know you are just having a laugh.
Hopefully
If not its a concern

4K is right though , It was ‘Peace for our Time’ .. it’s often misquoted as you have as ‘Peace in our Time’.

Google it Exile

The actual speech was called.

"peace in our time"

His actual words were.

"peace for our time"

All good fun

Sure either way it relates to the thread mate.