MoM vs. Bradford

King (No votes)
Demetriou (No votes)
Gorman (No votes)
Green
Total votes: 1 (3%)
Haynes (No votes)
Inniss
Total votes: 25 (64%)
Khan
Total votes: 6 (15%)
Matt
Total votes: 3 (8%)
Sheehan (No votes)
Willmott
Total votes: 3 (8%)
Abrahams
Total votes: 1 (3%)
Dolan (No votes)
Howkins (No votes)
Total votes: 39

Re: MotM: Bradford (Home)

46
Frank Nouble 3 wrote:To prove the above comment is incorrect.

Currently

Inniss 23 votes
Bennett 7 votes
Khan 6 votes
Matt 3 votes
Wilmott 3 votes
Green 1 vote
Abrahams 1 vote (No idea where that thought came from but it will be counted)

Keep them coming.
First of all why would anyone trust your counting

Again those that want to vote for Bennett can't the poll should be void total joke

Secondly if someone has voted abrahams what has it got to do with you how anyone votes

Re: MotM: Bradford (Home)

47
Frank Nouble 3 wrote:
UPTHEPORT wrote:
Frank Nouble 3 wrote:
UPTHEPORT wrote:Sorry not good enough if you want to vote for Bennett you can't and you can't see any running totals

A rerun poll is needed
I cannot believe you are carrying on like this.
It was not your MOM to start with.
You are not interested in the final results or even more the ongoing results.
Scott Bennett has 7 votes so far.
Every vote is genuine, no wind ups so no need for you to interfere.
All the running totals are at the top of each page plus 7 for Scott.
What about the votes from the other poll that was wrongly removed and why would anyone trust you a man that has manipulated votes before to suit your anti podge agenda
As that poll was removed pretty sure they can vote again on the official poll.
There is no anti Padraig Amond agenda as you know.
If Podge plays regardless of how he plays we all know he will start off with 2 votes.
The only votes not recorded were from 1 contributor who had multiple ongoing Usernames and voted within a few minutes around half a dozen times for Padraig.
I believe he is no longer able to vote so problem has gone.
You are clearly hell bent on mischief making.
Jack and Will are clearly happy the way this poll is running so I will not explain any further to you.
The poll is fine and will continue as it is unless Mods think different.
I have counted your vote of course.
Fkin hell you don't half think you run the show

Re: MotM: Bradford (Home)

48
UPTHEPORT wrote:
Frank Nouble 3 wrote:To prove the above comment is incorrect.

Currently

Inniss 23 votes
Bennett 7 votes
Khan 6 votes
Matt 3 votes
Wilmott 3 votes
Green 1 vote
Abrahams 1 vote (No idea where that thought came from but it will be counted)

Keep them coming.
First of all why would anyone trust your counting

Again those that want to vote for Bennett can't the poll should be void total joke

Secondly if someone has voted abrahams what has it got to do with you how anyone votes
Clearly thinks he's more superior when it comes to motm utp, my point exactly, your vote is your vote

Re: MotM: Bradford (Home)

49
UPTHEPORT wrote:
Frank Nouble 3 wrote:To prove the above comment is incorrect.

Currently

Inniss 23 votes
Bennett 7 votes
Khan 6 votes
Matt 3 votes
Wilmott 3 votes
Green 1 vote
Abrahams 1 vote (No idea where that thought came from but it will be counted)

Keep them coming.
First of all why would anyone trust your counting

What query have you got with the above adding up?
You keep on about Scott.
He has 7 votes including yours.
Abrahams vote is counted.

Re: MotM: Bradford (Home)

50
Frank Nouble 3 wrote:
UPTHEPORT wrote:
Frank Nouble 3 wrote:To prove the above comment is incorrect.

Currently

Inniss 23 votes
Bennett 7 votes
Khan 6 votes
Matt 3 votes
Wilmott 3 votes
Green 1 vote
Abrahams 1 vote (No idea where that thought came from but it will be counted)

Keep them coming.
First of all why would anyone trust your counting

What query have you got with the above adding up?
You keep on about Scott.
He has 7 votes including yours.
Abrahams vote is counted.
I cant see the poll because I can't cast my vote

And I can't believe a man that has manipulated polls in the past and has multiple personalities how do I or anyone else know you are not voting more than once using your various personalities
And another poll which was correct was pulled and people voted who may not be on here to vote again

Re: MotM: Bradford (Home)

52
UPTHEPORT wrote:
Frank Nouble 3 wrote:
UPTHEPORT wrote:
Frank Nouble 3 wrote:To prove the above comment is incorrect.

Currently

Inniss 23 votes
Bennett 7 votes
Khan 6 votes
Matt 3 votes
Wilmott 3 votes
Green 1 vote
Abrahams 1 vote (No idea where that thought came from but it will be counted)

Keep them coming.
First of all why would anyone trust your counting

What query have you got with the above adding up?
You keep on about Scott.
He has 7 votes including yours.
Abrahams vote is counted.
I cant see the poll because I can't cast my vote

And I can't believe a man that has manipulated polls in the past and has multiple personalities how do I or anyone else know you are not voting more than once using your various personalities
And another poll which was correct was pulled and people voted who may not be on here to vote again
Give it a rest please.
For the last time your vote for Scott has already been counted.
No polls have been manipulated.
Again for the last time I have one User Name its Frank Nouble 3. I have 1 vote.
I voted for Ryan Inniss.
You cannot vote more than once as you tick your vote. End of.

Re: MotM: Bradford (Home)

54
Frank Nouble 3 wrote:
Caerleon Exile wrote:Abrahams
Its already been counted.
But be warned if you dare to vote for him again in the next match then it obviously won't

Re: MotM: Bradford (Home)

55
Frank Nouble 3 wrote:
UPTHEPORT wrote:Sorry not good enough if you want to vote for Bennett you can't and you can't see any running totals

A rerun poll is needed
I cannot believe you are carrying on like this.
It was not your MOM to start with.
You are not interested in the final results or even more the ongoing results.
Scott Bennett has 7 votes so far.
Every vote is genuine, no wind ups so no need for you to interfere.
All the running totals are at the top of each page plus 7 for Scott.
Oh the irony
It wasn't yours either

Re: MotM: Bradford (Home)

56
Frank Nouble 3 wrote:
UPTHEPORT wrote:
Frank Nouble 3 wrote:
UPTHEPORT wrote:
Frank Nouble 3 wrote:To prove the above comment is incorrect.

Currently

Inniss 23 votes
Bennett 7 votes
Khan 6 votes
Matt 3 votes
Wilmott 3 votes
Green 1 vote
Abrahams 1 vote (No idea where that thought came from but it will be counted)

Keep them coming.
First of all why would anyone trust your counting

What query have you got with the above adding up?
You keep on about Scott.
He has 7 votes including yours.
Abrahams vote is counted.
I cant see the poll because I can't cast my vote

And I can't believe a man that has manipulated polls in the past and has multiple personalities how do I or anyone else know you are not voting more than once using your various personalities
And another poll which was correct was pulled and people voted who may not be on here to vote again
Give it a rest please.
For the last time your vote for Scott has already been counted.
No polls have been manipulated.
Again for the last time I have one User Name its Frank Nouble 3. I have 1 vote.
I voted for Ryan Inniss.
You cannot vote more than once as you tick your vote. End of.
How do I know or anyone else know your not using one of your former identities because you got form

And you can vote more than once especially if you have split personalities

Re: MotM: Bradford (Home)

57
If you want to act like kids I'll ask Norman to get you some flags and you can join in the Guard of Honour at the Morecambe fixture?

C'mon let's be a little bit grownup and not so precious eh?

Re: MotM: Bradford (Home)

58
Willthiswork wrote:If you want to act like kids I'll ask Norman to get you some flags and you can join in the Guard of Honour at the Morecambe fixture?

C'mon let's be a little bit grownup and not so precious eh?
If you hadn't deleted a perfectly correct poll we wouldn't be in this situation :roll:

This one is clearly flawed

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users