Re: Name and shame

77
daftasfxxx wrote:
Frank Nouble 3 wrote:
daftasfxxx wrote:
Frank Nouble 3 wrote:
daftasfxxx wrote:
Exile 1976 wrote:I don’t think your boy was listening Daftas as it was chip van they were singing about.
Also I honestly don’t think McCall would make that up , why would he?
Me not listening m8, my boy did say chip shop, maybe McCall said it to justify his reaction to the idiot, his word is all we have after all
"his word is all we have after all"

Says it all. :roll:
Go and give your head a wobble, check for any brain cells before you slaughter our club over some kids with an innocent chant and a buffoon
The complaint is relating to the chanting.
Do everyone a favour and keep your head down.
Innocent chant listen to yourself.
The kids probably were clueless but somebody amongst them started it.
Outsiders read this so cut out the crap protestations.
Read what you said previous, you are doing the damage ffs.
In your words its "bullshite" and we only have Mccalls word.
No need for insults you are doing it to yourself. :roll:
I give up, I can't argue anymore with plankton
Krill.

Re: What the hell? Name and Shame!

78
excessbee wrote:The starting point for the investigation must surely be to take McCall at his word. However, in law, that probably needs confirmation from at least one of our supporters. Hopefully someone will do so.
The starting point for any investigation is to gather evidence without making any presumption. At the infamous Swansea Cup tie I genuinely heard 'black' when the chant was in fact 'Jack'. As any criminal brief will tell you, the nightmare witness is not the liar, it is the honest person who is mistaken.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Free beer, Lord Tredegar's Parrot