theale wrote:I don't agree with stan on everything but the man does his research and makes some very valid points concerning our club,it probably frustrates him that he's trying to educate pork sometimes,no research causes blinkered thick reaction formally.

Stan A. Einstein wrote:

theale wrote:I don't agree with stan on everything but the man does his research and makes some very valid points concerning our club,it probably frustrates him that he's trying to educate pork sometimes,no research causes blinkered thick reaction formally.

Good morning,

Not being the Pope I am in fact far from being infallible and am often wrong. I am therefore grateful that you don't always agree with me. Only idiots agree with each other all the time. What I do is look at the evidence and from what I know estimate that which I think will be the outcome.

Reading your post and seeing that Jimmy Exile seems to be posting away at length the evidence would suggest that Jimmy is asking me a question/s



A few weeks ago, utterly bored with this inane rather silly and frankly untruthful man I informed Jimmy that I wouldn't be replying to his garbage in future. I have done this by not bothering to read his 'contributions'. It is of course up to others to whether they read his posts and if they do whether they take any notice of them. The same thing is true of my contributions also.

My view is that people should hold their own opinions and express those opinions if they wish. Nobody in their right mind believes that they are always right and I learn from those who disagree with me but actually take the time to say why.

Best regards,

Stan/Bren

Cornish Exile wrote:

Stan A. Einstein wrote:

theale wrote:I don't agree with stan on everything but the man does his research and makes some very valid points concerning our club,it probably frustrates him that he's trying to educate pork sometimes,no research causes blinkered thick reaction formally.

Good morning,

Not being the Pope I am in fact far from being infallible and am often wrong. I am therefore grateful that you don't always agree with me. Only idiots agree with each other all the time. What I do is look at the evidence and from what I know estimate that which I think will be the outcome.

Reading your post and seeing that Jimmy Exile seems to be posting away at length the evidence would suggest that Jimmy is asking me a question/s



A few weeks ago, utterly bored with this inane rather silly and frankly untruthful man I informed Jimmy that I wouldn't be replying to his garbage in future. I have done this by not bothering to read his 'contributions'. It is of course up to others to whether they read his posts and if they do whether they take any notice of them. The same thing is true of my contributions also.

My view is that people should hold their own opinions and express those opinions if they wish. Nobody in their right mind believes that they are always right and I learn from those who disagree with me but actually take the time to say why.

Best regards,

Stan/Bren

Your statement re. Mike Fynn's salary was not an opinion, however, but appeared to be a statement of fact.

Maybe, as you're not responding to Jimmy Exile, you could enlighten me as to the going rate for a Div. 2 manager and how this compares with Mike Flynn's.

Threadbare wrote:
Be a good chap and tell us all how you know.


Now, don't worry about revelaing your soucre, I'm sure many of us know who that is anyway,

Stan A. Einstein wrote:

Threadbare wrote:
Be a good chap and tell us all how you know.


Now, don't worry about revelaing your soucre, I'm sure many of us know who that is anyway,

Newport County have directors and club officials. They have wives and girlfriends, friends and partners. We all have someone and in many cases a number of people with whom we confide.

As for not worrying about not revealing my sources, don't worry I won't.

Cornish Exile wrote:

Stan A. Einstein wrote:

Threadbare wrote:
Be a good chap and tell us all how you know.


Now, don't worry about revelaing your soucre, I'm sure many of us know who that is anyway,

Newport County have directors and club officials. They have wives and girlfriends, friends and partners. We all have someone and in many cases a number of people with whom we confide.

As for not worrying about not revealing my sources, don't worry I won't.

The clue is in the word confide. Surely, information, true or otherwise, given in confidence, should not be made public.

daftasfxxx wrote:Transparency Stan transparency
You was the biggest advocate for it

Amberexile wrote:As long as Stan co-operates with any investigation to determine which director or club official leaked the information in the first place, does it really matter who told Stan?

btw I don't expect there will be an investigation as sacking one person for gross misconduct of this kind would start an avalanche of dismissals when some of the people who would need to be involved are themselves serial leakers.

Stan A. Einstein wrote:

daftasfxxx wrote:Transparency Stan transparency
You was the biggest advocate for it

Odd isn't it? You want me, who owes you no fiduciary duty to reveal my source(s) but want the club who do owe you a fiduciary duty to be able to keep this information from you.

daftasfxxx wrote:Transparency Stan transparency
You was the biggest advocate for it

daftasfxxx wrote:

Stan A. Einstein wrote:

daftasfxxx wrote:Transparency Stan transparency
You was the biggest advocate for it

Odd isn't it? You want me, who owes you no fiduciary duty to reveal my source(s) but want the club who do owe you a fiduciary duty to be able to keep this information from you.

I already know mate so don't worry