pembsexile wrote:Not sure if this will be allowed - from a slightly drunk 2nd half pub TV view only - Sheehan. Frank - I don't mind if you discount my vote.

I was more concerned about the nearly 12 minutes of injury time. Crazy.

Not a problem mate.

All good fun

Sheehan 22
Townsend 19

Haynes/ Inniss/ Amond/ Nurse.

One vote each.

Keep it coming

Frank Nouble 3 wrote:All good fun

Sheehan 22
Townsend 19

Haynes/ Inniss/ Amond/ Nurse.

One vote each.

Keep it coming

I make that Amond 2 votes or are you selective editing again

Will keep it going until Mid day tomorrow so keep those votes coming.

Over 40 contributions so far.

Cheers

Unless you register all votes you're making a mockery of this poll because of your agenda

Townsend

Nick Townsend, for his positioning, anticipation and shot stopping.

The main criticism made of him in the past based on few appearances (I saw him at Gillingham) is that he is less vocal than Tom King, which maybe says more about the modern game (as played by County) than about goalkeeping skills.

sheehan, then townsend, our strikers very poor.

daftasfxxx wrote:Unless you register all votes you're making a mockery of this poll because of your agenda

No, it's you that's doing that. And you are spoiling, or at least trying to spoil a bit of harmless fun.

Stan A. Einstein wrote:

daftasfxxx wrote:Unless you register all votes you're making a mockery of this poll because of your agenda

No, it's you that's doing that. And you are spoiling, or at least trying to spoil a bit of harmless fun.

Evening Stan.
I am totally ignoring him.
Its totally unfair on the 45 plus contributors who have so far nominated players and enjoy this ongoing thread.
Why go out of your way to wreck it for everyone.
Jim voted for Amond again but I respect his vote as genuine.
As everybody else who has voted.
In fact its great to see players getting just the odd vote as everyone sees the game a little differently.

Regards

No beef with Pembs who said he wouldn't mind if you didn't count his vote, but why include one based on only watching half a game?

Sheehan, thought he was a cut above the rest.

Stan A. Einstein wrote:

daftasfxxx wrote:Unless you register all votes you're making a mockery of this poll because of your agenda

No, it's you that's doing that. And you are spoiling, or at least trying to spoil a bit of harmless fun.

No I am not, my vote is genuine if it wasn't for Amond we would be going to a reply or worse, who the hell give him or you the right to decide otherwise?

George Street-Bridge wrote:No beef with Pembs who said he wouldn't mind if you didn't count his vote, but why include one based on only watching half a game?

Because the fella is genuine and not making mischief.

If you have got the time go back to every previous MOM and take note every time who he voted for
but also the comments added.

Surely you count every vote cast no matter who it comes from.

This isn't an election in some tinpot South American dictatorship. Who gave you the right to rig the poll to suit your opinions?