Re: Marsh-Brown

5
sblair1979 wrote:No loss at all. Painfully slow and ponderous on the ball.
No idea how you can come to that conclusion as he hardly kicked a ball for us.
Painfully slow, imo he was pretty nippy for the few minutes he got on the pitch.
Now if you were describing Scott or Matty I would agree 100% even Ryan Inniss or Howkins as well.

Re: Marsh-Brown

6
He played 21 times for us so I think I saw enough. Every time he got the ball he seemed to dwell on it for a few seconds, killing any momentum we may have had. He scored one goal and had two assists.

Inexplicably Flynny often tried him as a number 10 where he was useless. He came on extra time in the play off final and slowed the game down every time we got the ball.

Re: Marsh-Brown

7
Wasn't my cup of tea at all. Probably had more to offer than we ever saw, but I agree he looked lethargic in and out of possession and often killed any momentum we had at the time.

Still, good luck to him wherever he ends up. His goal at Yeovil was a goodun and I'll remember that one.

Re: Marsh-Brown

11
Exile 1976 wrote:
rncfc wrote:I get the impression it probably wasn't that mutual, but I guess he must have given consent so not entirely untrue.

Reading his tweet it looks like perhaps he instigated it....new club no doubt lined up.
LA Galaxy isn’t it ???? :cheers: :lol:

Re: Marsh-Brown

12
Incredible that a player has been happy to not play and just pick up wages for this long.Flynny made him aware that he wasn't part of his plans in August so why wait until now.A footballer has a short career so why waste it.Probably paying him 3 of the 6 months upfront to tempt him to go.

Re: Marsh-Brown

13
Probably because he was earning more money here than he was offered, if indeed he was offered anything, elsewhere?
He had a contract so why move unless it suited him? He was still getting in his International side so no need to go anywhere unless it benefited him... looks like he has a team lined up to sign for. Good luck to him.
Seems very popular with the players, although if the rumours are true, I don’t think he will be on OB’s Christmas card list.

Re: Marsh-Brown

14
Exile 1976 wrote:Probably because he was earning more money here than he was offered, if indeed he was offered anything, elsewhere?
He had a contract so why move unless it suited him? He was still getting in his International side so no need to go anywhere unless it benefited him... looks like he has a team lined up to sign for. Good luck to him.
Seems very popular with the players, although if the rumours are true, I don’t think he will be on OB’s Christmas card list.
Pray tell,what rumour.

Re: Marsh-Brown

15
Exile 1976 wrote:Probably because he was earning more money here than he was offered, if indeed he was offered anything, elsewhere?
He had a contract so why move unless it suited him? He was still getting in his International side so no need to go anywhere unless it benefited him... looks like he has a team lined up to sign for. Good luck to him.
Seems very popular with the players, although if the rumours are true, I don’t think he will be on OB’s Christmas card list.
lol you heard the same as me then. same reason that Tom King is out in the cold

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: countymadbel