That's funny Brendan I can't see anywhere where I disagreed with you, just pointed out that you were commenting on something you didn't even see though in all the games I've watched over RP I have yet to see a ball boy deliberately hold on to a ball, take their time yes but to hold on to it no and that's where you draw the line which Plymouth have obviously instructed there ball boys to crossStan A. Einstein wrote:This is the thing Frank. Rather than debate there's a group of people here who just want to disagree for the sake of disagreeing. They don't read what is written they merely listen to each other and are quick to make really bad points.Frank Nouble 3 wrote:Wrong again, actually asking a question as the more I know about the game it becomes more interesting.daftasfxxx wrote:Nobody said that harps but you are yet another one commenting on a game you never even watchedFrank Nouble 3 wrote:Are contributors saying we lost the game because of a ball boy in injury time.
Heard a few but that's up with the best.
As somebody is always saying on here Move on.
County had Plymouth on the ropes the last quarter, injury board raised , minimum of 4 minutes, goal keeper goes down fakes an injury and times wastes so long he's booked, between him and the ball boy they waste over 2 minutes of the 4 and how long did the ref add....
14 seconds
Now you have explained politely I have my answer.
Daftas does though take the biscuit. In his determination to disagree with you he actually says exactly what I have been saying.
Quite funny in its way but silly nonetheless.
Re: Grandstand - Plymouth at Home Park
92Ours do not even get up off there arses for us or the opposition.daftasfxxx wrote:That's funny Brendan I can't see anywhere where I disagreed with you, just pointed out that you were commenting on something you didn't even see though in all the games I've watched over RP I have yet to see a ball boy deliberately hold on to a ball, take their time yes but to hold on to it no and that's where you draw the line which Plymouth have obviously instructed there ball boys to crossStan A. Einstein wrote:This is the thing Frank. Rather than debate there's a group of people here who just want to disagree for the sake of disagreeing. They don't read what is written they merely listen to each other and are quick to make really bad points.Frank Nouble 3 wrote:Wrong again, actually asking a question as the more I know about the game it becomes more interesting.daftasfxxx wrote:Nobody said that harps but you are yet another one commenting on a game you never even watchedFrank Nouble 3 wrote:Are contributors saying we lost the game because of a ball boy in injury time.
Heard a few but that's up with the best.
As somebody is always saying on here Move on.
County had Plymouth on the ropes the last quarter, injury board raised , minimum of 4 minutes, goal keeper goes down fakes an injury and times wastes so long he's booked, between him and the ball boy they waste over 2 minutes of the 4 and how long did the ref add....
14 seconds
Now you have explained politely I have my answer.
Daftas does though take the biscuit. In his determination to disagree with you he actually says exactly what I have been saying.
Quite funny in its way but silly nonetheless.
Whoever is responsible for them needs to sort them out.
Totally pointless they cannot even bother to pass the towel to Mickey.
All of them are a total waste of space.
Re: Grandstand - Plymouth at Home Park
93So why do you think I'm wearing a stupid cap?daftasfxxx wrote:That's funny Brendan I can't see anywhere where I disagreed with you, just pointed out that you were commenting on something you didn't even see though in all the games I've watched over RP I have yet to see a ball boy deliberately hold on to a ball, take their time yes but to hold on to it no and that's where you draw the line which Plymouth have obviously instructed there ball boys to crossStan A. Einstein wrote:This is the thing Frank. Rather than debate there's a group of people here who just want to disagree for the sake of disagreeing. They don't read what is written they merely listen to each other and are quick to make really bad points.Frank Nouble 3 wrote:Wrong again, actually asking a question as the more I know about the game it becomes more interesting.daftasfxxx wrote:Nobody said that harps but you are yet another one commenting on a game you never even watchedFrank Nouble 3 wrote:Are contributors saying we lost the game because of a ball boy in injury time.
Heard a few but that's up with the best.
As somebody is always saying on here Move on.
County had Plymouth on the ropes the last quarter, injury board raised , minimum of 4 minutes, goal keeper goes down fakes an injury and times wastes so long he's booked, between him and the ball boy they waste over 2 minutes of the 4 and how long did the ref add....
14 seconds
Now you have explained politely I have my answer.
Daftas does though take the biscuit. In his determination to disagree with you he actually says exactly what I have been saying.
Quite funny in its way but silly nonetheless.
Seriously I don't mind, it's hardly that I'm a shrinking violet. But don't you think that if people took the time to read what is being written and didn't have knee jerk reactions this board would be more interesting?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: amberandy, Exile 1976, Free beer