It's not as if he hadn't already proven it repeatedly before that either.Exile 1976 wrote:In fairness in the short time he was here Butcher showed he was fecking clueless
Re: He wont ....but
32Not a bad centre half thoughSJG99 wrote:It's not as if he hadn't already proven it repeatedly before that either.Exile 1976 wrote:In fairness in the short time he was here Butcher showed he was fecking clueless
Re: He wont ....but
33Bobby Moore and Bobby Charlton were pretty reasonable players but totally clueless at management as was Mark Lawrenson etc etc etc.
Jack Charlton and Kevin Keegan were the opposite though
Jack Charlton and Kevin Keegan were the opposite though
Re: He wont ....but
34Wasn't a lot of use to us in that role aged about 57 either?Cornish Exile wrote:Not a bad centre half thoughSJG99 wrote:It's not as if he hadn't already proven it repeatedly before that either.Exile 1976 wrote:In fairness in the short time he was here Butcher showed he was fecking clueless
Re: He wont ....but
35Play Reid then.Exile 1976 wrote:Forget about Jazzi, he hasn't played any meaningful football for such a long time , why would anyone think he'd do better than the players we already have?
He went to Connie on loan for a month or two, barely did anything there and wasn't asked back & seemingly no one else interested in him.
Re: He wont ....but
36Is that Beryl you’re talking about?Bush wrote:Play Reid then.Exile 1976 wrote:Forget about Jazzi, he hasn't played any meaningful football for such a long time , why would anyone think he'd do better than the players we already have?
He went to Connie on loan for a month or two, barely did anything there and wasn't asked back & seemingly no one else interested in him.
Re: He wont ....but
37Just read MF's interview about tomorrow.He still insists players have to show in training, so hope I'm wrong,but looks like same old to me.
Re: He wont ....but
38To play devil's advocate: if the regulars are working hardest in training, and the peripheral players don't look up for it, do you think Flynn should pick the regulars who've served us well this season up until the recent blip, or pick players who hadn't performed well previously and aren't excelling in training to warrant dislodging players with more experience and match sharpness?Percy plunkett wrote:Just read MF's interview about tomorrow.He still insists players have to show in training, so hope I'm wrong,but looks like same old to me.
Not trying to catch you out; genuinely interested in your answer.
Re: He wont ....but
39I'm more interested in the fact he seems to be saying that the players brought in during January are not up to the job.Kairdiff Exile wrote:To play devil's advocate: if the regulars are working hardest in training, and the peripheral players don't look up for it, do you think Flynn should pick the regulars who've served us well this season up until the recent blip, or pick players who hadn't performed well previously and aren't excelling in training to warrant dislodging players with more experience and match sharpness?Percy plunkett wrote:Just read MF's interview about tomorrow.He still insists players have to show in training, so hope I'm wrong,but looks like same old to me.
Not trying to catch you out; genuinely interested in your answer.
Re: He wont ....but
40My feeling is that training is there to keep everyone in tip top fitness,there shouldn't be a need for players to have to out do anyone or risk injury.The hard training is done pre season.The players MF has picked so far have mostly done the business but some have needed to be rested recently as their match sharpness has been lost.Also,rotation gives other players a chance and they will be fresher than the regular ones who are jaded.It would keep players on their toes and create completion for places.Spurs have had a gruelling couple of weeks,I'd be very surprised if the same eleven or so have played every game.Kairdiff Exile wrote:To play devil's advocate: if the regulars are working hardest in training, and the peripheral players don't look up for it, do you think Flynn should pick the regulars who've served us well this season up until the recent blip, or pick players who hadn't performed well previously and aren't excelling in training to warrant dislodging players with more experience and match sharpness?Percy plunkett wrote:Just read MF's interview about tomorrow.He still insists players have to show in training, so hope I'm wrong,but looks like same old to me.
Not trying to catch you out; genuinely interested in your answer.
Re: He wont ....but
41Think you will find very little if any change tomorrow.
All the new signings are basically not up to it.
All the new signings are basically not up to it.
Re: He wont ....but
42Harps62 wrote:Think you will find very little if any change tomorrow.
All the new signings are basically not up to it.
That may be right, but we won't know unless they play. If they don't play soon, it must call MF judgement into question. Something ain't right.
Re: He wont ....but
43So why f@@king sign them in the first place?Harps62 wrote:Think you will find very little if any change tomorrow.
All the new signings are basically not up to it.
Re: He wont ....but
44It doesn't need radical change.Harps62 wrote:Think you will find very little if any change tomorrow.
All the new signings are basically not up to it.
Play a back 3 that picks itself
Swap Wilmott for Pipe.
Midfield of Labadie, Tozer, Sheehan/Dolan
Dan and Robbie down the flanks can get some crosses in as Mclousky and Amond are two of the best in the air in league 2. Frank just needs a breather.
Last edited by Alan G Bryant on February 16th, 2018, 8:10 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: He wont ....but
45on current form the old players aren't up to it eitherHarps62 wrote:Think you will find very little if any change tomorrow.
All the new signings are basically not up to it.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Blackandamber, Fu Ming, KingOfGwent, mad norm