lowandhard wrote:I must say , that’s my impression too. His main problem is he disrupts threads with vendettas against his sworn enemies on this board who have a history between them. In fairness , he has good reason when he’s misrepresented or misquoted but it bores other posters. Like you I don’t find his views negative, on the contrary. I think he wants to “out “ humbug and dishonesty but his occasional pomposity grates with some people. I think that this occasional vice is forgivable as long as it’s entertaining . Live and let live I say, what was the ban for because I still don’t get it? It seems a bit arbitrary.
Fair point there and I would agree with most of that. I never understand posters on here who says he doesn't have the County' best interest at heart. He saw the club fold 30 years ago and will do all in his power to prevent it happening again.
As regards his 'pomposity', take it in the spirit it is intended. If that winds people up, I suspect that he gets a kick out of that! It's not serious.
One thing - you mentioned misrepresenting and misquoting. I would go further than that. Sometimes 'selective' posting is used. Quoting 'bits' of what he wrote in a previous post. Sometimes quoting a posters whole post can be long winded and takes up a lot of space on the mb, but, if you want to state what the poster wrote it is probably better to use the whole post so that the message can be taken in context.