Willthiswork wrote:Where? I've googled it and I'm right.
BTW WTO.
WTO. Fair enough. Of course the UK would need to break international law by breaching the 1998 Belfast/Good Friday agreement. Now not only would the UK be in breach and would thus invite international sanctions, but the Nancy Pelosi said only last week that in such an event there would be no possibility of a US trade deal. Which rather f@cks up that idea.
Pembs is quite right. The binary choice offered by Cameron in 2016 was utterly foolhardy.
By the way claiming to be right, doesn't make you right. On which point what is your view on sovereignty with respect of ECHR having supremacy over British courts pursuant of the ECHR treaty of 1950? And how do you think leaving the EU will impact on that?
By the way as a barrister I practiced in the field of both EU and ECHR law. And whilst there is no doubt that there is room for interpretation of statute and precedent your obvious lack of knowledge for me confirms why we should retain democracy but never again fall into the madness of plebiscite..