Re: First stadium meeting.
46Sounds like a good start. I couldn’t make tonight but will hopefully be able to make the next.
Many thanks for the update, have pencilled the date in the diary.Mr Figo wrote:Hi John,
I sent you a message before the meeting and a couple could not make it. In all we chatted for nearly two hours and it was really to give those 5 of us who attended the chance to air views and chew the fat when it comes to establishing a stadium trust fund. We were all in agreement that the first couple of meetings should be to get views out from those who have an interest. It is important that we try to establish links with the club as well and show we are there to support.
Willthiswork has posted another thread re: supporter groups that support County. The aim is to establish dialogue with these groups and open up the discussion further.
The next meeting is pencilled in for the 29 Jun @ 8pm for those that want to join or just want to listen to what is being said. Please PM myself or Willthiswork for details.
How pathetic.County ranger wrote:Should there not be minutes published and full disclosure on what the disagreement was about. Surely Stan this is what you endlessly preach about others
Agenda for next meeting
List of attendees
Brilliant! Can't make it upCounty ranger wrote:Should there not be minutes published and full disclosure on what the disagreement was about. Surely Stan this is what you endlessly preach about others
Agenda for next meeting
List of attendees
Minutes are as follows:County ranger wrote:Should there not be minutes published and full disclosure on what the disagreement was about. Surely Stan this is what you endlessly preach about others
Agenda for next meeting
List of attendees
County ranger wrote:Should there not be minutes published and full disclosure on what the disagreement was about. Surely Stan this is what you endlessly preach about others
Agenda for next meetingj
List of attendees
I know not whether the comment was meant to be flippant or not (though I think it likely was), but I'd say probably not from last night (which looks like just an exploratotry exercise).County ranger wrote:Should there not be minutes published and full disclosure on what the disagreement was about. Surely Stan this is what you endlessly preach about others
Agenda for next meeting
List of attendees
Mr Figo said there was five at the meeting.Willthiswork wrote:Minutes are as follows:County ranger wrote:Should there not be minutes published and full disclosure on what the disagreement was about. Surely Stan this is what you endlessly preach about others
Agenda for next meeting
List of attendees
Attendance: Brendan, Joe, Mike, David
We discussed possible ways of connecting with the club and supporters to look into the feasibility of a trust fund to purchase/develop our own stadium to provide the club with 'football with a future'.
Agenda for next meeting will be issued shortly.
Bit Pedantic!Percy plunkett wrote:Mr Figo said there was five at the meeting.Willthiswork wrote:Minutes are as follows:County ranger wrote:Should there not be minutes published and full disclosure on what the disagreement was about. Surely Stan this is what you endlessly preach about others
Agenda for next meeting
List of attendees
Attendance: Brendan, Joe, Mike, David
We discussed possible ways of connecting with the club and supporters to look into the feasibility of a trust fund to purchase/develop our own stadium to provide the club with 'football with a future'.
Agenda for next meeting will be issued shortly.
Fair enough Percy.Percy plunkett wrote:No,just interested.Who isJoe,Mike and David.Is Mr Figo one of these or is he the fifth.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users