Re: So who's taking over
62Craig Bellamy? Wants to get into management apparently, still lives in Cardiff I think.
Re: So who's taking over
63With all of his identities he may have been mentioned several times.rncfc wrote:Surprised nobody has mentioned the obvious choice; Harps.
Re: So who's taking over
64Leaving aside views on Harps, two questions.IMB wrote:With all of his identities he may have been mentioned several times.rncfc wrote:Surprised nobody has mentioned the obvious choice; Harps.
Firstly how does having a dig at Harps enhance this conversation?
Secondly in any event with Harps being banned don't you both think that having a go at someone who can't respond is a bit tacky?
rncfc, you often make interesting contributions you can do much better than this.
Re: So who's taking over
65Yes, definitely not “ cricket “ to attack those who can’t defend themselves. Incidentally I drop in occasionally to County Chat on Facepest and this individual gets much the same treatment there. I read his posts and fail to see anything offensive in them but somebody mentioned he was banned on here so I presume he has offended some people. Can anyone elucidate why he is hounded?Stan A. Einstein wrote:Leaving aside views on Harps, two questions.IMB wrote:With all of his identities he may have been mentioned several times.rncfc wrote:Surprised nobody has mentioned the obvious choice; Harps.
Firstly how does having a dig at Harps enhance this conversation?
Secondly in any event with Harps being banned don't you both think that having a go at someone who can't respond is a bit tacky?
rncfc, you often make interesting contributions you can do much better than this.
Re: So who's taking over
66Why don't we build a statue of him?
Cult hero
Hall of fame
Freedom of Newport
F F S
Cult hero
Hall of fame
Freedom of Newport
F F S
Re: So who's taking over
68Yes, I noticed that. Someone must have asked for odds for him in the first place. Otherwise I can't imagine the bookies thinking of him all on their own.Amberexile wrote:Rowberry's odds now at evens
And another bet placed afterwards to cause the odds shorten. Interesting!
Re: So who's taking over
69Who? Flynn or Ashurst? I wouldn’t be against either but what about Lucas and Addison?mad norm wrote:Why don't we build a statue of him?
Cult hero
Hall of fame
Freedom of Newport
F F S
Re: So who's taking over
70High risk appointment could be brilliant but also be Anthony Hudson part 2. The market is so thin £10 on anybody would crash odds.Amberexile wrote:Rowberry's odds now at evens
Re: So who's taking over
71Can someone put a pound on Percy Plunkett,I’d love to be in the running although,I’m probably likely to be there with Woodhouse and Davy McDougall in regards to getting the job.
Re: So who's taking over
72Firstly wouldn't you have a plan?
That plan would have been Flynny/Nowheremen/moneyball/Flynny. Then a Flynny acolyte.
If not, and really not looking. A Plan ala Brentford.
In descending order.
Then Alex Neale ( in our dreams)
Tisdale. (Gettable)
The other two:
Andy Morrison I think ex Connah Quay's or Jimmy Rowberry out of Cardiff City's youth etc. But a good coach.
Personally the best candidate is the one we just got rid of. But if the club has a plan, if so it hasn't articulated it. I'd go younger than a higher wage.
Of course stay-up, but 'essentially' sacking Flynny enforces a Brentford etc plan.
Like to hear it though from the new 50 directors just 'bin appointed.
That plan would have been Flynny/Nowheremen/moneyball/Flynny. Then a Flynny acolyte.
If not, and really not looking. A Plan ala Brentford.
In descending order.
Then Alex Neale ( in our dreams)
Tisdale. (Gettable)
The other two:
Andy Morrison I think ex Connah Quay's or Jimmy Rowberry out of Cardiff City's youth etc. But a good coach.
Personally the best candidate is the one we just got rid of. But if the club has a plan, if so it hasn't articulated it. I'd go younger than a higher wage.
Of course stay-up, but 'essentially' sacking Flynny enforces a Brentford etc plan.
Like to hear it though from the new 50 directors just 'bin appointed.
Re: So who's taking over
73Only coached a few sessions and he has a nickname.rncfc wrote:Surprised nobody has mentioned the obvious choice; Harps.
Re: So who's taking over
74bullieslowandhard wrote:Yes, definitely not “ cricket “ to attack those who can’t defend themselves. Incidentally I drop in occasionally to County Chat on Facepest and this individual gets much the same treatment there. I read his posts and fail to see anything offensive in them but somebody mentioned he was banned on here so I presume he has offended some people. Can anyone elucidate why he is hounded?Stan A. Einstein wrote:Leaving aside views on Harps, two questions.IMB wrote:With all of his identities he may have been mentioned several times.rncfc wrote:Surprised nobody has mentioned the obvious choice; Harps.
Firstly how does having a dig at Harps enhance this conversation?
Secondly in any event with Harps being banned don't you both think that having a go at someone who can't respond is a bit tacky?
rncfc, you often make interesting contributions you can do much better than this.
Re: So who's taking over
75That’s a bit rich from you Stan attacking people who can’t answer back
That’s all you ever did with the ex directors
Should have done this
Should have done that
You got really personal with lots of them
And no way could they answer back on a fan’s Forum
You do have double standards
That’s all you ever did with the ex directors
Should have done this
Should have done that
You got really personal with lots of them
And no way could they answer back on a fan’s Forum
You do have double standards
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: DT1892