Re: GRANDSTAND: Carlisle (home) match-day thread

47
Most of the damage was self inflicted. Carlisle were quite poor but we matched them. Have to say the conditions in the second half must have made it an unpleasant playing experience. For the penalty, the ball was pinging all over the place and I couldn't see what had happened. Haynes committed his foul after the referee had already blown the whistle for a foul by Baker Richardson but he was probably already committed to the challenge. Some great saves by Joe in the last fifteen minutes, and two good goals by Telford.

Re: GRANDSTAND: Carlisle (home) match-day thread

48
UPTHEPORT wrote: October 20th, 2021, 9:58 am As I said it's awkward to see unless the club did alternative view last night they sometimes do .

But his body language was the big tell he didn't stand round arguing
I remember once being given out of a bumped ball. Being a gentleman I walked. Perhaps Ed is likewise a gentleman. Unlike most of the riff raff on this board. Seriously though Jim, once the red card was shown that was it. Perhaps Upson simply has a brain.

Re: GRANDSTAND: Carlisle (home) match-day thread

49
Can't tell from the camera angle whether it was handball or not. However, the ref did take a long time to award the pen, not in itself a bad or incorrect thing but would have thought if he had a clear view then he would award the pen much quicker. Gives the impression that the ref was heavily influenced by the Carlisle players, most of whom didn't appeal initially. As others have said once the red card comes out what's the point in Upson protesting.

Re: GRANDSTAND: Carlisle (home) match-day thread

54
faerun exile wrote: October 20th, 2021, 11:55 am Can't tell from the camera angle whether it was handball or not. However, the ref did take a long time to award the pen, not in itself a bad or incorrect thing but would have thought if he had a clear view then he would award the pen much quicker. Gives the impression that the ref was heavily influenced by the Carlisle players, most of whom didn't appeal initially. As others have said once the red card comes out what's the point in Upson protesting.
Maybe he took a long time because he consulting the nearest linesman.

Re: GRANDSTAND: Carlisle (home) match-day thread

55
Blackandamber wrote: October 20th, 2021, 2:15 pm
faerun exile wrote: October 20th, 2021, 11:55 am Can't tell from the camera angle whether it was handball or not. However, the ref did take a long time to award the pen, not in itself a bad or incorrect thing but would have thought if he had a clear view then he would award the pen much quicker. Gives the impression that the ref was heavily influenced by the Carlisle players, most of whom didn't appeal initially. As others have said once the red card comes out what's the point in Upson protesting.
Maybe he took a long time because he consulting the nearest linesman.
Doubt it. Lino on the Bisley would be wrong side and wouldn't have been able to see Upson's hand and the other lino was too far away with a more restricted view through players than the ref. The ref guessed. Sometimes you win , sometimes you lose. Time to move on.

Re: GRANDSTAND: Carlisle (home) match-day thread

57
faerun exile wrote: October 20th, 2021, 11:55 am Can't tell from the camera angle whether it was handball or not. However, the ref did take a long time to award the pen, not in itself a bad or incorrect thing but would have thought if he had a clear view then he would award the pen much quicker. Gives the impression that the ref was heavily influenced by the Carlisle players, most of whom didn't appeal initially. As others have said once the red card comes out what's the point in Upson protesting.
The ref originally signalled a corner.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users