Re: An open letter to the chair of Newport County.
106What I understood from David Buttress's podcast interview last year is he didn't instigate the Blues coming in but he did have the right to veto it, which obviously he declined to do.
But there is an issue, that is the long term security of our club having a suitable venue at which to play. I believe it wise to try to fix a leaking roof whilst the sun shines, not when it starts to rain. I do have a plan, and that is that those who have charge of our club should examine each and every opportunity and explore ways to move our club forward. I believe it is imperative that we all engage with each other. Nobody has all the the ideas, and many ideas don't work. But the more we work together the better our chances of making the progress we all want.Bangitintrnet wrote: May 26th, 2022, 12:21 pm
When there is an issue, or when you have a plan, or when there is an opportunity for positive change, crunch the numbers and come back.
I disagree I do have a plan.Bangitintrnet wrote: May 26th, 2022, 1:13 pm You don't have a plan at all Stan. A plan is something that a responsible individual can evaluate, cost and deliver if that is the chosen route.
What you have is a wish list, for someone, anyone, other than yourself.
If there becomes an issue with security , don’t you think that David Buttress is better qualified, and better able to deal with, what after all is his remit? If he can't find a buyer for the Dragon's that is his issue, not ours. His problem to solve.
Finally it is not the WRU who are considering a list of proposals, (only one of which is culling the Ospreys or the Dragon's) , it is a committee of 8, only two of which are WRU representatives.
Bangitintrnet wrote: May 26th, 2022, 2:29 pm Dear Mr Satan Einstein, of the Panic Station, Witts End Lane, Worryaton.
I note your concern that we may have a hole in the roof, but can confirm that the pitch at Rodney Parade does not have the dome that Jerry Sherman promised all those years ago.
As for your plan to get the Council to fix the giant leak, again I can confirm that the cabbage patch has not wealded any vegetables of oversize proportions in recent times.
I would like to point out that the club are in the healthiest financial position probably ever, having been in profit for the last 4 years, two of which was during covid and despite having to share with those nasty Romans.
I know you have asked "what have the Romans ever done for us?"
Well actually to obtain finance to resurface the pitch, greatly enhance our options for electronic advertising, alterations to the hospitality boxes seating, new flood lighting, and re vamped changing rooms, is quite difficult to arrange for a small company post covid. So we are grateful to our Roman friends, along with the Council for such a lovely bridge providing foot access for the Amber Army, now that the amphitheatre has fallen into such distress.
Have a good day, and try hard to put things into proportion.
Kind regards,
Gormless G.
Which begs the question who received the revenue for it and more importantly who receives the revenue for our use of the ground. I can see an argument for all of that going direct to the Dragons rather than to the WRU or to the Dragons via the WRU but also see that the WRU might want the revenue going to them in the first instance.George Street-Bridge wrote: May 26th, 2022, 6:31 am What I understood from David Buttress's podcast interview last year is he didn't instigate the Blues coming in but he did have the right to veto it, which obviously he declined to do.
I'm afraid that simply isn't true.Bangitintrnet wrote: May 26th, 2022, 3:46 pm I actually have Stan, it is up to you to point out the benefits, which you singularity refuse to do, and keep saying that there are no benefits to anything other than Council ownership.
Well there we are. You don't think I've been clear, I don't think you have. The readers of this board can make their own minds up. It's regrettable that you finish with insults, but I've decided that it's far better not to engage in exchanging such barbs. It doesn't get us anywhere.Bangitintrnet wrote: May 26th, 2022, 5:34 pm You never ever will Stan, will you. You are completely deaf, as it doesn't suit, does it?
I have previously commented on each of the points mentioned above, and pointed out to you, that each, and every one, is based on an assumption. In fact it is your own personal assumption, it isn't actually factual. You don't seem to understand (or want to understand) the difference between facts and fiction. That doesn't seem to cut any ice with you does it?
The lack of any other comments on this thread should be deafening, however for you it just isn't, is it?
Users browsing this forum: countymadbel