Re: Million dollar Harps
Posted: August 16th, 2022, 7:54 pm
Who wants a love in ?
It's not a case of a love in. For me and I think for others, the point is that whilst people being racist or homophobic or advocating violence is deserving of a ban, saying things that are unpopular is not.daftasfxxx wrote: August 16th, 2022, 7:50 pm If you want a love in with harps just join the County page on Facebook where he's continues to annoy the **** out of people on there, I can't see his post fortunately as he blocked me for disagreeing with him as he has done with numerous people on there
That's rightStan A. Einstein wrote: August 16th, 2022, 8:16 pmIt's not a case of a love in. For me and I think for others, the point is that whilst people being racist or homophobic or advocating violence is deserving of a ban, saying things that are unpopular is not.daftasfxxx wrote: August 16th, 2022, 7:50 pm If you want a love in with harps just join the County page on Facebook where he's continues to annoy the **** out of people on there, I can't see his post fortunately as he blocked me for disagreeing with him as he has done with numerous people on there
Hi Jim, you know me I’m not duplicitous in any way. I’ve received a private message which I have been asked to forward as he has no access , I will relay in full below, this is of course a one off as I’m not a courier service I’m on facepest so converse with him on county chat. I’m honestly trying to clear this up in case there’s been some misunderstanding. This is the message: -UPTHEPORT wrote: August 19th, 2022, 10:06 am Think your all forgot he was accused of sending abusive messages via the PM option numerous user names to beat bans .
It makes me laugh as well one poster in particular backing him drove Kate (girlsaturday) off here with his sexist comments hypocrite
100% agree again. What I don’t understand is that I am pretty sure it was mentioned that he was banned on here for using duplicate user names. I even sent a pm to Admin about it asking them to reconsider. He says that he was told he was banned because the site ‘hits’ were down and it was because of him and his views.lowandhard wrote: August 19th, 2022, 9:18 am Yes, I agree. Persecution for an unpopular view is bullying by any other definition.
Probably, and quite rightly so.
whoareya wrote: August 19th, 2022, 11:13 am
Stockholm Syndrome innit.
And I recall the posts referring to Jim when portering at the RGH
Yes mate i wasn't having my name mentioned like that he was accusing me of being rude to a patient I actually spoke to the Union law department if it had carried on I would have taken actionwhoareya wrote: August 19th, 2022, 11:13 am He's swerved the issue there. When banned he had one username because all the others had been sussed and then blocked.
That he's now the subject of angst on the County facebook forum must say something eh?
Let's be honest, people stuck up for him, but not necessarily because they agreed, but because they disliked the poster(s) he was arguing with.
Stockholm Syndrome innit.
And I recall the posts referring to Jim when portering at the RGH
New account